HHMI Newsgroup Archives

From:          Yeshivat Har Etzion Office <office@etzion.org.il>
To:            yhe-intparsha@etzion.org.il
Subject:       INTPARSHA62 -11: Parashat Vayigash
                     YESHIVAT HAR ETZION
        ISRAEL KOSCHITZKY VIRTUAL BEIT MIDRASH (VBM)
  *********************************************************
                              
              INTRODUCTION TO PARASHAT HASHAVUA
                         PARASHAT  VAYIGASH
                      Yosef's Brothers
                    By Rav Michael Hattin
INTRODUCTION
 Last  time, in Parashat Vayeshev, we began to  consider the  story  of Yosef and his brothers.  We briefly  outlined
the  primary catalysts in the account of Yosef's descent  to Egypt: his intentional arousal of his brothers' enmity,  his
donning of the coat of many colors, and his premature dreams of  greatness.  Additionally, we recounted the role  of  his
brothers  in  the terrible crime of his sale: their  initial schemes to kill him, Reuven's unsuccessful attempt to return
him  to  his  father,  and Yehuda's embraced  suggestion  of selling  him  to the Ishmaelites.  Recall that with  Yosef's
auction,  the  involvement  of  his  brothers  in  his  life abruptly  ended, as the Torah shifted its focus to  describe
his  trials, travails and triumphs in the house of  his  new master  Potiphar  and eventually in the service  of  Pharaoh
himself.  In the end, Yosef achieves the promise implied  in his  dreams  by becoming Viceroy of Egypt.  Except  for  one
unusual,   puzzling   and   seemingly   unrelated   incident concerning   Yehuda  and  Tamar,  the  brothers   completely
disappear  from  the account until more  than  twenty  years later  when the famine predicted in Pharaoh's dream  strikes
Canaan and the region, and the brothers are forced at  their aged  father's  behest to reluctantly journey  to  Egypt  in
search of provisions.  Yaacov, fearing for the well-being of Binyamin,  Yosef's  younger brother and the  only  remaining
progeny of beloved Rachel, refuses to allow him to accompany the others on their trek.
 In  Parashat  Miketz,  the brothers  thus  reenter  the narrative,  as they stand and then kneel before the  Viceroy
of  Egypt,  none  other than their long-lost and  presumably unmissed  brother Yosef.  Yosef, now dressed as an  Egyptian
in  the  honored  robes  of his high office,  shielded  from prying  questions  by  an official interpreter,  immediately
recognizes them but they fail to discern his true  identity. What  follows is a troubling series of events in which Yosef
subjects  his  brothers  to great  psychological  stress  by accusing  them of espionage, imprisoning them, and demanding
that  they bring their brother Binyamin before him in  order to  corroborate their counter claims of no wrong doing.  The
commentaries grapple with Yosef's cruel conduct and  attempt to  explain  his motives: is he driven by vengeance,  is  he
obsessed with the fulfillment of his prophetic dreams, or is there  perhaps  another  way to  explain  his  seeming  hard
heartedness?
THE FIRST EXCHANGE BETWEEN YOSEF AND HIS BROTHERS
 We  will  attempt to ascertain Yosef's true  intent  by carefully considering the various elements of his  plan  and
gauging  them against the reaction of his brothers.   In  so doing, we will be able to trace the brothers' progression as
they come to their own dawning realizations about their role in  the dastardly deed of two decades earlier.  Let us begin
by  cataloging the several steps of Yosef's maltreatment  of his brothers and noting their response.
(1) YOSEF - "Yosef saw his brothers and recognized them.  He behaved  cruelly towards them and spoke harshly.he  said  to
them:  'you  are spies, and you have come to  ascertain  the weakness of the country!'" (Bereishit 42:7-9)
BROTHERS  - "They said to him: 'no sir, we are the  sons  of one father.  We are truthful, we are not spies.we twelve are
sons of one man in the land of Canaan.  The youngest brother remains with his father, and one is no more.'" (42:10-13)
(2)  YOSEF  - "Yosef said.'you are spies.  Corroborate  your claims  by bringing your young brother here'.he placed  them
in  prison under guard for three days.  On the third day  he said:  '.if  you are truthful, let one of you be imprisoned,
while  the  rest  of  you  bring back  provisions  for  your households.  Bring your younger brother to me to corroborate
your  words so that you do not die.'  They did so."  (42:14-20)
BROTHERS - "The brothers said to each other: 'we are  guilty concerning our brother, for we saw his distress as he  cried
out   to  us  but  we  did  not  respond.   Therefore   this tribulation has befallen us!'  Reuven said to them: 'I  told
you  not to harm the child but you would not listen, and now his death is being requited!'" (42:21-22)
(3)  YOSEF - "Yosef turned from them and wept.he took Shimon and  imprisoned  him before their eyes.  He  commanded  that
their  vessels be filled with grain and that each  brother's money be returned to his sack." (42:24-25)
BROTHERS - "They took their provisions and placed them  upon their  donkeys and traveled from there.  At the inn, one  of
them opened his sack in order to feed his donkey and saw his money  in  plain  view.their hearts  were  afraid  and  they
exclaimed: 'what is this that God has done to us?'"  (42:26-28)
THE BROTHERS' FIRST JOURNEY TO EGYPT
 In  this  preliminary exchange between  Yosef  and  his brothers,  which we might call 'The Brothers' First  Journey
to  Egypt,' three discrete elements are discernable.  First, Yosef  speaks harshly to them and accuses them of espionage,
then  he  incarcerates them for three days, and  finally  he imprisons Shimon alone and then sets the stage for the  next
encounter  by returning their money to them.   We  may  note that  Yosef  himself weeps during the course of the  meeting
and   must  turn  aside  to  regain  his  composure   before continuing with the subterfuge.  The alarm and distress that
Yosef  engenders  in this first exchange pivots  around  the threat of unjust imprisonment 'under guard.'
 As  for the brothers, to Yosef they vehemently deny any wrongdoing  and  loudly proclaim their  complete  innocence.
Among  themselves, however, they soon ponder their own guilt concerning Yosef's maltreatment at their hands much earlier,
a   gnawing  suspicion  that  is  immediately  confirmed  by Reuven's  explicit  linkage.  In the  meanwhile,  Shimon  is
singled  out for especially harsh treatment, and then  'one' of  the  other  brothers, who remains unnamed, triggers  the
next spasm of introspection by his discovery of the returned money.  What is most remarkable about the brothers' reaction
is  that  they connect their present misfortune with ancient events  of  more than twenty years earlier, evil deeds  that
they  had  long  since buried under the  rubble  of  willful forgetfulness.  Let us note that in their initial claims  to
Yosef  they indicate that 'the youngest brother is with  our father  (in  Canaan), and one of the brothers is  no  more,'
thus exonerating themselves from any role in Yosef's demise. 
THE RETURN TO CANAAN - INTERLUDE OF GRIEF
 The  brothers return to Canaan with heavy hearts.  They describe  to  their aged father in halting  words  all  that
befell  them  and  then stand by to witness his  predictable reaction of intense grief and disappointment: "Yaacov  their
father  said  to  them:  'you have  made  me  bereft  of  my children.  Yosef is no more, Shimon is no more.  If you will
take  Binyamin,  I  cannot  bear  it!'"  (Bereishit  42:36). Reuven  tries to reassure his father and to convince him  to
release Binyamin to his care: ".kill my own two children  if I  fail  to return Binyamin to you.,'" but Yaacov is adamant
that  he  will not risk the loss of his beloved Binyamin  by allowing  him  to  descend to Egypt.  Thus,  Shimon  remains
incarcerated for some time.
 Time  passes,  the famine continues  to  rage  and  the family  of Yaacov begins to starve.  Yaacov again  asks  his
sons to go to Egypt in order to secure sustenance but now it is  Yehuda's  turn  to respond: ".if you  do  not  send  our
youngest brother we cannot go, for the man said to us not to appear before him without our youngest brother.send him with
me.   I will guarantee his safety.if I do not return him  to you,  then I will stand iniquitous before you until the  end
of   time!"  (43:3-9).   Yaacov  relents,  sending  off  the brothers  with  Binyamin,  with  a  gift  offering  for  the
Viceroy,  with  the returned funds, and with  his  tremulous blessings  for their success.  The brothers depart  and  set
their course for Egypt.
 In  this  intermediate section between the two episodes of  their meeting with Yosef, the focus is clearly on Yaacov
and  his  grief.   The  brothers  must  see  theifather   in mourning,  stricken with fear over the fate  of  Shimon  and
terrified   of   losing  Binyamin,  his  other   'favorite.' Significantly, Reuven's initial attempts to win his father's
confidence are rebuffed, while Yehuda's subsequent  efforts, colored by the pangs of hunger, are haltingly accepted.
THE BROTHERS' SECOND JOURNEY TO EGYPT
 The  brothers  now return to Egypt and stand  again  in Yosef's presence. As before, let us list what transpires  as
a function of Yosef's conduct and the brothers' response.
(1)  YOSEF - "When Yosef saw Binyamin with them, he said  to his  servant:  'bring these men to my  home  and  prepare  a
festive   meal,  for  they  will  eat  with  me  at  noon.'" (Bereishit 43:16)
BROTHERS  -  "The  brothers became  afraid  when  they  were brought to Yosef's house.  They said: 'It is because of  the
money  that  was  returned to our sacks.we will  be  falsely accused.and taken as slaves!'  They approached the valet and
explained.but he said: 'do not be afraid, for your  God  and the  God  of  your  fathers has given you treasure  in  your
sacks.   Your  payment  was received by  me!'   He  released Shimon to them." (43:18-23)
(2) YOSEF - "Yosef returned home and they presented him with their gifts.He saw Binyamin among them.he quickly left their
presence  and wept.they served the meal, and he  seated  the brothers according to their age." (43:26-33)
BROTHERS  -  "The brothers were amazed.Binyamin  received  a portion  five times as great as theirs, and they  drank  and
feasted with him (Yosef)." (43:33-34)
(3)  YOSEF  -  "Yosef  commanded his  servant  to  fill  the brothers'  sacks  with grain and to return  their  money  to
them.  He further said: 'Place my silver goblet in the  sack of  the  youngest.as morning broke, they were sent on  their
way.They had scarcely left when Yosef's servant pursued them and  apprehended them, saying: 'why did you  repay  kindness
with  wickedness? This goblet is my masters, he  divines  by it, you have done a grievous deed!'" (44:1-5)
BROTHERS - "They said to him: 'why does our master say  such things?.How could we dare steal anything from your  master's
home?   If  it  is true, then the one with who it  is  found shall  die, and we shall all be your slaves!'  He said:  'so
be it.  The one with whom it is found shall be my slave, but the  rest  of  you  shall go free.'   The  brothers  quickly
removed their sacks and opened them.  He checked in  all  of their  sacks, beginning with the oldest and ending with  the
youngest, and the goblet was found in Binyamin's sack!  They tore  their  garments, loaded their donkeys and returned  to
the city." (44:7-13)
THE SECOND EXCHANGE
 In   this  second  encounter  between  Yosef  and   his brothers, three steps are again evident.  This time, though,
Yosef  conducts himself as the paragon of graciousness.   He invites  the  brothers  to eat with him,  a  singular  honor
indeed   to   sup  with  the  Viceroy.   He  sees  Binyamin, momentarily  loses his composure, but then  seats  them  and
serves them.  They are merrily sent on their way at dawn, no doubt  after sleeping the pleasant sleep of complete relief.
Suddenly,  however, they are pursued, accused of  theft  and forced to return, as Yosef's scheme approaches its climactic
conclusion.
 Concerning  the  brothers, they  sincerely  demonstrate deep  concern about the returned funds and try to present  a
convincing  case.  Surprisingly, their fears are  completely dispelled  as Yosef's servant announces that God  must  have
planted treasure in their sacks, since he did receive  their payment  initially.  Their guard is further  let  down  when
Yosef  returns,  graciously receives their gift  and  feasts with  them.   It  is with complete shock, then,  that  their
fortunes   are   reversed   as   Yosef's   silver    goblet, surreptitiously deposited in Binyamin's sack, serves as  the
unjust pretext for seizing him as a slave!
 We  may  note  that in this second series, the  initial fears  and misgivings of the brothers, their faded  memories
of  what  they had done to their brother Yosef years before, are  at  first  allayed,  only to  abruptly  resurface  with
ominous  effect.   Additionally, it  seems  that  this  time around,  it  is the motif of 'money, silver' and 'ill-gotten
gains'   that  constitutes  the  source  of  the   brothers' downfall.
YOSEF'S REVELATION TO THIS BROTHERS
 In  the  final act of the drama, it is Yehuda who  must take  the  primary  role.  Responding to  Yosef's  claim  of
having  ascertained  their guilt through divination,  Yehuda pleads   on  behalf  of  Binyamin,  readily  admitting   the
brothers'  guilt:  "What  shall  we  say?  How  can  we   be righteous?   God  has  discovered your  servants'  iniquity!
Behold, we are your slaves, both us as well as the one  with whom  the  goblet  has  been found!"  (44:16).   When  Yosef
refuses and instead demands only Binyamin's custody,  Yehuda responds  with his pained and eloquent description of  their
younger  brother's  death (i.e. Yosef),  Yaacov's  resultant intense  and  never  assuaged grief, and  the  certainty  of
Binyamin's  seizure  resulting  in  their  aged  and  broken father's  demise.  Nobly, Yehuda offers to  take  Binyamin's
place, for he cannot bear the thought of facing his father's anguished distress.  Finally, as the drama comes to a  close
at  the  beginning of Parashat Vayigash, Yosef relents.   In his  third and most emotional outburst, he breaks  down  and
cries, at last revealing his true identity to his brothers!
 How  are  we  to understand Yosef's conduct  throughout this  ordeal?   What  must  he  achieve  by  subjecting  his
brothers  to intense emotional torment?  It is difficult  to see  vengeance as his primary goal, as if he must repay  his
brothers  for all the grief that they brought upon him  when they  concluded his sale with the Ishmaelites.   After  all,
did  he  not  twice cry as he went through with his  scheme, indicating that he was himself distressed by the  pain  that
he  imposed  upon  his brothers?  We must  therefore  search elsewhere  for the cause behind his conduct, and our  search
is  aided by the structural analysis of above.  Recall  that the two descents to Egypt, and the two exchanges with Yosef,
revolved around unjust incarceration and unjust gains.  Note also  that  it  is  Reuven  and Yehuda  who  take  the  most
prominent roles as advocates, while Shimon and 'one' of  the other  brothers are charged with indiscretion.  Finally  the
entire  orchestration  set  into motion  by  Yosef  revolves around  wresting  Binyamin from Yaacov's protective  embrace
and  placing the brothers in a charged situation where  they must rescue him, even at the cost of their own freedom.
RELIVING THE PAST
 In  other  words,  what Yosef attempts  to  do  in  his carefully  crafted  artifice is to  force  the  brothers  to
relive  the  trauma of his own sale more  than  two  decades earlier.  When the brothers first come down to Egypt,  Yosef
immediately  recognizes them.  No doubt, he  exchanges  some pleasantries,  makes  some  innocent  enquiries   but   soon
discovers  to  his  dismay that the brothers  are  the  same brothers,  never having confronted or resolved their  tragic
role  in his presumed demise.  They speak of Yosef as if  he somehow  disappeared, 'one of them is not,' as if they  know
nothing  of the circumstances surrounding his disappearance, as  if  they  are blameless and completely innocent  of  any
wrongdoing.
 Yosef speaks harshly to them, recalling their own harsh and  hateful words to him on the eve of their evil scheme  -
'they  could  not speak peaceably to him' (Bereishit  37:4). He  accuses them of espionage, no doubt recalling their  own
charges that he would tell damaging tales to their father  - 'Yosef  brought evil reports of their conduct to his father'
(37:2).   Yosef  then incarcerates them in a guarded  prison referred  to in the original Hebrew as the 'mishmar.'   This
is the very term that described Yosef's own incarceration in Potiphar's house when he stood accused by Potiphar's wife of
wrongdoing  (40:3).  Significantly, though,  Yosef  at  that time  referred to it as 'the pit,' when he ruefully remarked
to  the  butler that 'I have done nothing wrong  to  deserve being  thrown  into  this  pit!'  (40:15).   Could  not  the
experience   of  three  days  of  unjust  incarceration   be calculated  to  arouse in the minds of the brothers  similar
associations?  Had they not themselves thrown him  into  the pit in order to silence his exaggerboasts and purported acts
of spying?
 As  for  Shimon,  Yosef singles  him  out  for  special treatment.  Could  it be that Shimon's  imprisonment  is  an
oblique  reference  to his prominent  role  in  Yosef's  own seizure?   It will be recalled that the Torah never mentions
exactly which brothers were instrumental in formulating  the plan  to  kill  him.  This is done out of consideration,  to
conceal the shame of a dastardly act.  All that is stated is that  "one  brother said to his fellow: behold,  here  comes
this 'master of dreams.'  Now, let us kill him and throw his body  into a pit and say that a wild beast has devoured him,
then   we  shall  see  what  will  become  of  his  dreams!" Nevertheless, an oral tradition has preserved  the  identity
of the perpetrators: "Yosef imprisoned Shimon for he was the one  who cast him into the pit.  He was the one who said  to
Levi: 'behold, here comes this master of dreams' (quoted  by Rashi, 42:24).
 All of this misfortune begins to leave its mark, as the brothers   painfully   recall   the   episode   of   Yosef's
imprisonment and sale.  Reuven, who initially had  tried  to rescue  Yosef, here returns again in a role of advocacy,  in
essence  reliving  his  earlier intervention.   His  telling remark  serves  as  the  trigger for the  brothers'  belated
introspection.  The brothers return to their aged father  in Canaan,  and on the way 'one of them' discovers  his  money.
Could  it be that this brother who later "at the inn  opened his  sack  to  give provender to his donkey, and  found  his
bundle  of money inside" was none other than Levi, the  same Levi  that  according  to Rashi was Shimon's  accomplice  in
clamoring for Yosef's death?  The discovery of the money now fills  the  brothers with dread, for had they not  used  the
funds to purchase grain and would they not now be accused of theft?  Thus Levi now brings even more misfortune upon them!
BACK TO CANAAN
 Coming  home, the brothers must now face their father's grief.   He  exclaims that he has already lost  Yosef  years
before, and now stands to lose Shimon and Binyamin as  well. His  pained protests at the prospect of releasing  Binyamin,
the  remaining  favorite, to their charge call  to  mind  of course  his  reaction upon receiving the  brothers'  feigned
report  of  twenty years earlier concerning  Yosef's  death. How  terribly  they  had miscalculated the  depth  of  their
father's  grief  back then, to what great lengths  had  they subsequently  gone  in order to conceal their  role  in  the
affair!  This time, however, any suppression or cover up  is impossible:  we  are  responsible  for  bringing  this   new
disaster upon you and we must now suffer the results!
 Although   Reuven   attempts  to   win   his   father's confidence,  Yaacov rebuffs him: "My son will  not  go  down
with  you!" (42:38)  Eventually, the famine has its  effect, and   Yaacov  reluctantly  agrees  to  send  Binyamin  under
Yehuda's  aegis.  Rashi advances his own reason for Reuven's failed  entreaties,  but it is clear  that  Providence  must
orchestrate  events  just  this  way:  Reuven  was  directly blameless in the events surrounding Yosef's sale, but he did
fail  in not exercising his firstborn authority in order  to put a halt to the brothers' wicked scheme.  That failure,  a
function of his inadequacy and powerlessness to act in order to  save his father's most beloved son is thus relived  here
as  Yaacov refuses him, no doubt casting a burning  question mark  over  Reuven's continued fitness to claim the  coveted
role  of 'firstborn.'  Yehuda, on the other hand, had  first raised  the  sinister  suggestion of selling  Yosef  to  the
Ishmaelites.   Although his intervention  preserved  Yosef's life,  it  also caused him to descend to Egypt.   Therefore,
Yehuda  must  now  relive his role by taking  Binyamin,  the 'Yosef  figure,' down to Egypt, but this time with the  oath
that he will protect him at all costs.
RETURNING TO EGYPT - THE SCENE OF THE CRIME
 The  second  exchange between Yosef  and  the  brothers revolves around the money that reappears in their sacks, and
the  silver  goblet  that mysteriously finds  its  way  into Binyamin's  luggage.  Try as they might, it seems  that  the
brothers  cannot  shake themselves of  the  'kesef'  (money, silver)  that  so malevolently clings to them and  to  their
possessions,  bringing  upon them such  untold  grief!   Who could  fail to see the connection between these 'ill  gotten
gains'  and  the  'twenty  pieces of  silver  (kesef)'  that constituted  the  price  for  Yosef's  cruel  and  heartless
auction  to the Arabian traders plying their wares  down  to Egypt  (37:28)?   Yosef the Viceroy remembers  it  only  too
well,  recalling how he sat, motionless and  bound,  on  the lumbering camel at the rear of the winding caravan,  as  his
brothers'  disdainful expressions receded  and  disappeared. His  brothers  now  relive it also,  but  finally  with  the
dawning  awareness  that every deed has  consequences,  that there  can  be no evasion from the past, that no  amount  of
mental and emotional gymnastics can forever self-conceal  an act of evil.
 As  events unfold, the brothers come to finally own  up to  their  act.  Yosef's careful orchestration is calculated
to  place  Binyamin  in  the exact same  situation  that  he himself  had experienced so long ago.  Like Yosef,  Binyamin
is  his  father's favorite and the only tangible  memory  of Yosef   that   remains.  Yehuda  finally  secures   Yaacov's
permission  to  take  Binyamin in his care  and  Yosef  soon showers his blood brother with extra attention.  Yosef  then
instructs  his  servant  to conceal  his  silver  goblet  in Binyamin's sack and to then accuse him of theft.   Demanding
that  Binyamin  be turned over, the servant meets  with  the brothers' refusal.  Returning to Yosef they tearfully  plead
for his release and Yehuda steps forward to entreat Yosef in consideration  of Yaacov's fragile emotional  state.   "When
our father sees that his son is no more he shall die, and we shall  be  guilty of having brought down our father  to  the
grave  in sadness!"   How striking is this passage,  for  it without  doubt demonstrates that the brothers  have  finally
changed  their ways.  This time, the brothers act in defense of  their youngest sibling, even though he is their father's
favorite.  This time, they cannot bear the thought of seeing their  father in mourning, even though for the last  twenty-
two  years  they  had borne it well.  This time,  Yehuda  is finally  able  to vocalize the words:  "We have  an  elderly
father, and a child of his old age whose brother has  DIED." This  time,  the brothers are willing to suffer imprisonment
so that Binyamin can go free.
 Finally,  now  certain  of his  brothers'  remorse  and contrition, Yosef reveals his true identity.  Had he done so
at  the moment of their initial meeting, his brothers  would have   never  come  to  the  state  of  true  teshuva   that
characterizes  their  reconciliation  now.   The  story   of Yosef's  brothers  makes  it  clear  that  true  repentance,
although  sometimes  precipitated by external  events,  must nevertheless come from within.  Yosef could have secured his
brothers' impassioned pleas for forgiveness much earlier  in the  narrative,  had he revealed himself  immediately.   But
that  repentance would have constituted nothing more than  a startle response predicated on shock and fear, rather than a
measured  and considered act of real return. Our  Sages  say that  "the  Merciful  One desires our  hearts,"  for  it  is
sincerity  and  truthfulness with ourselves that  constitute the  first steps in making restitution.  Ultimately, we must
strive to mend the torn and frayed threads of our own lives, the  hurt feelings and tragic misunderstandings that destroy
relationships.  Inevitably, though, that process must  begin with an honest examination of our own soul.
Shabbat Shalom
YESHIVAT HAR ETZION
ISRAEL KOSCHITZKY VIRTUAL BEIT MIDRASH
ALON SHEVUT, GUSH ETZION 90433
Copyright (c) 2001 Yeshivat Har Etzion. 
All rights reserved.
***************************************************************

Return to Newsgroup Archives Main Page

Return to our Main Webpage


©2011 Hebraic Heritage Ministries International. Designed by
Web Design by JB.