From: "Hebraic.Heritage.Newsgroup@sol.wwwnexus.com"
<Hebraic.Heritage.Newsgroup@sol.wwwnexus.com>
To: Hebraic Heritage Newsgroup <heb_roots_chr@geocities.com>, Hebraic Heritage Newsgroup 2 <heb_roots_chr@geocities.com>
Subject: The WHY Agreement
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 15:43:59 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

From: Bridges for Peace (Clarence Wagner)
To: heb_roots_chr@geocities.com
Subject: The Wye Accord

Wye, O Why?

The Wye River Agreement, signed by Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin
Netanyahu and the Palestinian Authority (PA) Chairman, Yasser Arafat, on
October 23rd is now history. However, the implementation of the agreement
and the implications of what this agreement will mean for the future are
still to be reckoned with. Since the signing of the agreement, snags have
already developed in the aftermath of two suicide bombings in Israel by
Palestinian terrorists against Israelis.

Even before this, the agreement went under a microscope, and it
became readily apparent that many clauses were not only ambiguous, but both
sides had completely different interpretations for many of them.

In the end, the Arab world was complaining about the Wye agreement,
as well as much of the Jewish world. Both felt that their leaders gave up
too much and got too little in return.

Meanwhile, what did the agreement say? Who gave what? How will it
be implemented? Will it lead to peace or war? Knowing that this agreement
will make a definite impact on the future of Israel's leadership and
policy, let's take a look at it and study its implications.

WHAT DID THE AGREEMENT SAY?

The agreement focused on yet another redeployment by Israel from
areas of Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), handing them over to the
Palestinian Authority. In return, Israel is supposed to see the
cancellation of the Palestine National Covenant (a gesture promised for the
fourth time!), and a crackdown on Palestinian incitement and terrorist
activity. Key provisions of the agreement are:

*Israel will relinquish an additional 13 percent of territory in Judea and
Samaria, putting the total given over to the PA thus far at 40% of the
territory.

* Israel will release 800 of 3,000 jailed Palestinians, called political
prisoners by Yasser Arafat.

* A Palestinian airport will open in Gaza, and Yasser Arafat can fly in
and out without a security inspection by Israel.

* Israel will provide safe passage to Palestinians moving between Gaza and
other Palestinian areas.

* The Palestinians will strengthen their anti-terrorist measures in Judea
and Samaria (the West Bank) and Gaza. With the CIA monitoring them, they
will work under a timetable to arrest alleged terrorists and confiscate
weapons.

* The Palestinian National Council (PNC) and other Palestinian groups will
meet to reaffirm the letter sent in January 1998 to Clinton regarding the
anti-Israeli provisions in the Palestine Liberation Organization covenant.
U.S. President Clinton will attend that meeting.

* Israel and the Palestinians will jointly consider an additional Israeli
pullback. Israel and the Palestinians will start final status talks on
issues including the future of Jerusalem.

In a separate agreement between the United States and Israel, the
US agreed to review the case of Jonathan Pollard, a Navy intelligence analyst
convicted of spying for Israel, but made no promise to release Pollard.
The US also committed to help Israel carry out the redeployment by
relocating military bases, building new roads, etc. The aid package is
thought to be nearly $1 billion.

WHAT IS NEW WITH THIS AGREEMENT?

Dr. Aaron Lerner, the Director of Independent Media Review and
Analysis (IMRA) points out that when Prime Minister Netanyahu presented the
Hebron Agreement almost two years ago, he justified his concessions by
stressing the "Ross Note," which came with the deal, arguing that for the
first time Palestinian obligations were firmly set within the context of
RECIPROCITY. Both sides needed to give into the agreement to make it work,
not just Israel.

However, Arafat failed to honor his part of the deal after Israel
pulled out of most of Hebron, and Netanyahu, under the principle of
reciprocity, eventually decided to stop carrying out further withdrawals.
Back in January, 1997, political pundits and politicians promised that,
"THIS TIME the Palestinians would REALLY meet their obligations." And,
quite importantly, they said that if the Palestinians failed to fulfill the
bargain, NO ONE would blame Israel for digging in its heels on a further
redeployment. Israel did withdraw from Hebron in 72 hours, but the
Palestinians are at 21 months and counting without compliance to the
agreements. Meanwhile, the Israelis have again been pressured into ceding
13% MORE land at Wye for the same old promises and assurances of
reciprocity.

What's new in The Wye River Memorandum (WRM)?

- CIA MONITORING: Prime Minister Netanyahu has forfeited Israel's
right to independently determine that the Palestinians aren't keeping their
end of the bargain. This will be monitored by the US-CIA who will
determine compliance. By doing this, Netanyahu is making the Clinton
Administration both cop and judge. Israel won't even see the PA's plan to
combat terror (WRM paragraph II.A.(1)b.), and it is up to the US to monitor
implementation of the plan (WRM paragraph II.A.(1)c.). While some think
this is a good move, others have watched the US waffle on Saddam Hussein's
weapon's compliance and expect that the US may turn a blind eye, for
expediency and "the sake of peace." This is also the same CIA, which was
recently surprised by the Indian nuclear explosion in May, and said of the
Korean missile shot over the Japanese mainland in August, "We didn't know
they could do a third stage!" Meanwhile, it is normally the job of the FBI
(Federal Bureau of Investigation) who has the expertise to monitor
terrorism and criminal activity, not the CIA. In any event, the Clinton
administration's "hear no evil see no evil" approach towards Arafat does
not inspire confidence amongst Israelis that pressure will be put on the
Palestinians to comply with the terms of the agreement.

- NOT CHANGING THE PALESTINIAN CHARTER: The WRM does not require
the PLO to formally amend the Palestinian Charter, this was formerly a
major pillar of reciprocity. This Charter calls for the destruction of
Israel, which is why NOT amending it is inconsistent with the ongoing peace
process. Nevertheless, it now seems that it will never be officially
amended by the PNC. The WRM only requires Palestinian leaders to get
together to affirm that it SHOULD be amended. This weak affirmation should
be unacceptable to the US and the rest of the world, but they apparently
don't have a problem with this, and in fact, they are now endorsing this
half-baked process! Changing the PLO Covenant and mutual recognition was
the basis for Oslo I and Arafat agreed to do this back in September, 1993.
However he didn't follow through. He then rewrapped this package and gave
it again as a concession for the Jericho-Oslo Agreement (May, 1994); and
again for Oslo II (Sept., 1995); and again for the Hebron Accord (Jan.
1997); and now again for the Wye River Agreement. However, this time,
everyone has stopped pretending it will ever happen and we will probably
see US. President Clinton attending a mock session of Palestinian leaders
to agree that it should be changed without ever changing it. Don't be
fooled, the PLO still adheres to their Charter to destroy the State of
Israel, known to them as "the Zionist entity!"

NO CONTROL OVER A THIRD ISRAELI PULLBACK: Another concession deals
with yet another Further Redeployment, the third such pullout still to
come. Until now, the extent of third FRD was supposed to be determined by
Israel alone. Now, after the WRM, Israel has conceded that a joint
Israeli-Palestinian committee will "address this question" with the US
being "briefed regularly" (WRM Paragraph I.B.) This places the question
of Israel's security and what is acceptable into the hands of the PA and
the USA, who will certainly pressure Israel regardless of her security
needs. When the current second redeployment is completed, Arafat will
demand a third redeployment from all territory and eastern Jerusalem -- not
sufficing, obviously, with the 1% that Netanyahu has proposed. Arafat will
demand the acceleration of the final status negotiations, including those
on Jerusalem, refugees, settlements and borders -- all extremely
problematic issues. Time is pressing for Arafat. His age, health, and
mainly the promises that he has made to his people, make it certain that,
when the negotiations reach an impasse, he will again threaten to declare
independence on May 4, 1999.

REDUCTIONS IN THE PA POLICE FORCE AND WEAPONS: News reports claim
that the PA will reduce its force from 40,000 to 20,000, but there are no
numbers mentioned in the WRM. In fact, the WRM does not say that there is
any problem now with the size of the PA security forces, only that, "The
Palestinian side will provide a list of its policemen to the Israeli side
in conformity with the prior agreements."(WRM Paragraph II.C.(1)a.). Even
if the PA police force is reduced from 40,000 to 24,000, it can easily be
enlarged again, while land handed over to the PA is lost and cannot be
retrieved.

The same principle is true for illegal weapons, with the only
mention of PA arms being in Secretary of State Albright's side letter which
says that American "assistance to the Palestinian side will help ensure
that any retention of weapons is consistent" with the list of weapons in
the Interim Agreement.

WHAT ELSE IS NEW? In the initial stages of this second FRD
outlined in the WRM, the PA's Area A will more than triple in size from 3%
to 10.1%. The PA will have authority over a full 40% of Judea, Samaria (the
West Bank) and Gaza, controlling 97% of the Palestinian population, powers
of police, education and taxation; and a variety of security related
matters. Israel will not have the right to inspect Arafat's airplane when
he lands in Gaza, and they cannot inspect Palestinians travelling along the
safe-passageway between Gaza and the West Bank. Israel has agreed to all
of this, and in return, the only solid Palestinian action will be a
meaningless vote by the PLO Executive Committee reaffirming Arafat's letter
to Clinton that their Charter SHOULD be changed. Everything else will be
subject to American interpretation.

Roni Shaked, in the Israeli newspaper,Yediot Ahronot, wrote that "the Wye
Plantation agreement appears more like a coerced deal to temporarily
restore peace between a couple on the verge of divorce. The accord has not
restored any trust between the leaders, and certainly not between their
peoples. Nor has it dispersed the tensions in their relations. To the
contrary, the suspicion and tension will now only increase -- with each
side using a microscope to examine the actions of the other."
Arafat is certainly satisfied. From his perspective, the top priority is
to obtain territory -- which gives cause to continue the political process.

As long as he continues receiving territory, even only 13.1%, he will be
prepared to give the same concessions he has given before and then not
comply with them. Arafat now needs a 3-4 month halt to terrorism, during
which he will seek to prove that he is fighting Hamas and Islamic Jihad,
ceasing incitement, collecting weapons and arresting terrorists here and
there -- all with extensive media coverage. This will leave Israel with no
choice but to continue upholding the agreement and transferring more
territory to his control.

While the Palestinians are complaining that this process is taking too
long, let us consider that this entire process has moved too fast,
considering the complexity of the region. The risk to Israel's security is
enormous. Meanwhile, the Panama Canal Treaty stipulates 22 years for the
transfer of almost-full control of the Canal Zone from the US to Panama,
which is over 1500 miles away from the shores of the US and will not be
governed by people who pledge the destruction of the US!

Jeff Jacoby of The Boston Globe, points out that Arafat has reaped
a rich bounty from this peace process. He rules his own quasi-state, the
Palestinian Authority. Nearly all of Gaza is his, and every major town on
the West Bank -- and more land is to come. He enjoys international
deference and prestige. He has a well-armed police force and millions of
dollars. He controls Palestinian newspapers, radio, and TV. He is immune
from prosecution for his many crimes, which include the murder of children.
He has been awarded the Nobel Prize.

All through the years of peacemaking with Israel, Arafat has
repeatedly made clear just how far his vision of coexistence extends.
He made it clear again on Oct. 22.

On that date, even as the Wye negotiations were underway in
Maryland, PA police were arresting six Arabs from the village of Waladja,
near Bethlehem on the West Bank. They were seized for engaging in behavior
that is forbidden in Arafat's kingdom -- they had paid a condolence call on
the family of Itamar Doron, a 25-year-old Israeli Jew murdered a few days
earlier, while bathing in the stream at Moshav Ora. Other residents of
Waladja protested. The six, they said, had no right to visit the grieving
family "in the name of all the village." Arafat's Fatah organization
announced that while murder should be condemned, there must be no
condolence calls by Palestinians to Israeli homes. Such is the nature of
peace in Arafatland.

According to Jacoby, the road from Oslo has led to calamity. What
Israel offered was land for peace. The exchange it got instead was land for
terror: More Israelis have been blown up and gunned down by Palestinian
terrorists in the five years of "peace" than in the previous 15 years
before Oslo.

ISRAEL HAS EXCHANGED LAND FOR THREATS: Farouk Kaddoumi, head of
the PLO's political bureau, vowed on Oct. 14 that the Palestinians will
follow up their declaration of a state next May by launching "the battle against
Israeli forces" to eradicate "the Israeli presence on Palestinian lands."
Kaddoumi is seen by many as Arafat's most likely successor.

ISRAEL HAS EXCHANGED LAND ANTISEMITISM: The largest newspaper in the
Palestinian Authority, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, writes that Hitler's persecution
"was a malicious fabrication by the Jews." That "Jewish control over the
mass media has . . . put a pleasant face on the vile image of Jews." That
"Jews spread prostitution as a means of plunging the world into decadence,
abomination, and corruption."

ISRAEL HAS EXCHANGED LAND FOR INCITEMENT: Fiery sermons in
Palestinian mosques preach jihad against the Zionists. Schoolbooks exhort
children to "gather for war with red blood and blazing fire" and assign
essays on the question, "Why must we fight the Jews and drive them out of
our land?" Land for peace? Israel surrendered land and was paid back in
hatred. The Center for Palestine Research reports this month that 51
percent of the Palestinian public supports acts of violence against Israel.
If those are the sentiments of Israel's peace partners, how must its
enemies feel?

Jacoby concludes: What is most alarming about this latest Wye
agreement is that there is no Likud Party to oppose it. Netanyahu and his
foreign minister, Ariel Sharon, have acquiesced in an accord that would
have had them screaming had it been signed by their Labor predecessors.

The only sure consequence of Wye is that Israel will yield more
land and Arafat will demand still more. Eventually Israel will refuse to give, but
by then the State of Palestine -- with its Arab allies -- will be ready to
take the land. For the fifth time in five years, a peace agreement has been
signed that brings war closer. There is a reason Arafat wore battle
fatigues to the signing ceremony.

- by Clarence H. Wagner, Jr.
Editor - Dispatch from Jerusalem

********************************************************************

THE SURRENDER AT WYE
by Murray Kahl I&G News 10/25/98

In what can only be considered surreal, the Wye memorandum was
signed yesterday after days of wrangling, threats of walkout, and
ultimatums given by the Israeli delegation that they will only discuss
issues regarding Israel's security. Yet, the divisive issues were
transcended in what can only be described as a complete and total
surrender by Israel to an unusually, determined President Clinton. In
fact, the negotiations can only be described as between PM Netanyahu
and Clinton; Arafat appeared to be a bystander and Clinton his
advocate.

Why?

There is not an issue, nor a red line given by Netanyahu, that
has not been ignored. The issue of changing the Covenant is an
example of words disguising substance, superficiality over
content, deceit over honesty. Despite all the brave words
released, there is no guarantee that a single word will be
changed. All that is agreed is an invitation to PNC members, and
other Palestinian groups, many of whom have indicated they will
not show up, and validation by the US of the useless letters
given by Arafat, in violation of their own covenant, to Clinton.

Why?

The Wye memorandum says, "The Executive Committee of the
Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Central
Council will reaffirm the letter of 22 January 1998 from PLO
Chairman Yasser Arafat to President Clinton concerning the
nullification of the Palestinian National Charter provisions that are
inconsistent with the letters exchanged between the PLO and the
Government of Israel on 9/10 September 1993." Yet, Clinton sees
nothing unusual in face of this systematic pattern of denial.

Why?

Intrinsic to the above statement is that Arafat has never
complied with any agreements, beginning with his commitment to
the late Israeli Prime Minister Rabin, who made Arafat's
compliance an essential condition of recognition. Arafat again
sold his compliance during the Hebron agreement of 1996 and is
now selling it again or is he? In all previous statements, Arafat
guaranteed revision of the charter; however, with his new advocate
Clinton, all he commits to is inviting members of the PNC to a meeting
to hear Clinton speak. Clinton places forth this invitation as a
commitment.

Why?

And so the entire agreement is riddled with the subordination of
Israeli sovereignty to the US administration whose Arabist views
were never so clearly demonstrated.

Why?

All will be supervised, without Israeli participation, by a
politically motivated CIA, who will certify Palestinian
compliance, though they have never received any cooperation
before and probably never will from the Palestinians. We must
keep in mind the letters sent by Congressman Ben Gilman and
Senator Jesse Helms that accused Arafat of embezzling American
tax payer dollars and are still classified as secret. In 1995,
official documents smuggled from Arafat's office in Gaza detailed the
abuse of American funds by Arafat and when given to Clinton they were
ignored. Rather than take action against this misuse of American tax
dollars, Clinton continued to certify to Congress that Arafat complied
with the the terms of the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act (MEPFA),
until a disgusted congress halted all payments in August 1997 until
they received proof that Arafat did indeed comply. The funding is
still cut off as the proof has never been received.

Why?

In the face of Arafat's lying, stealing, murdering even his own
people, remember the murders of any Arab caught selling land to
Jews, and even accused by his cousin Faysel Husayni, in charge of the
Jerusalem portfolio for the PA, of stealing funds allocated for the
purchase of property in Jerusalem. Yet Clinton supports him.

Why?

While Arafat calls for Jerusalem as the capitol of his new state
and promises multi-ethnic freedom of worship, how many remember
two years ago when his forces broke through the wall of the
Church of the Holy Sepulcher and seized Christian property?

Arafat's record demonstrates a man who has no moral integrity,
yet we find an American president asking the world to believe
Arafat, trust Arafat, and demanding Israel compliance as Clinton
violates US commitments made during the Hebron agreement.

Why?

The Palestinians know that Clinton is their man, and it is not a
secret kept from the public. Just today (Oct. 24), Arafat senior
adviser Achmed Tibi on the Voice of Palestine, a vicious
anti-semitic radio station funded in part by USAID, bragged in an
interview on the VOP:

[Al-Mahmud] Ahmad al-Tibi, there also seems to be US praise and
admiration for the Palestinian negotiatory performance. What is
new about this performance?

[Al-Tibi] Let me tell you that one of the extremely important
results, in addition to the signing of the agreement and the
points I have already mentioned, is the bolstering of the
Palestinian-US ties. Today, these ties are at their peak. They
are as they have never been in the past. Israeli-US ties,
however, are at their lowest point and never before have they
dropped so low not even when Yitzhaq Shamir was prime minister
and James Baker was state secretary.

Why?

Curiouser and curiouser is Clinton's performance as he ignores
his responsibilities in Kosovo and Iraq. They ignore all of
Clinton's threats and destroy US credibility, yet Clinton
supports an Islamic despot who ranks among the worst.

Why?

One can only speculate at this performance by Clinton that is so
irrational and counterproductive to the well being of the US. It
is a strong Israel that is positioned at the forefront of an
Islamic incursion into the West, and any attempt to weaken Israel will
only result in American body bags.

***********************************************************************

From: Bridges for Peace (Clarence Wagner)
To: heb_roots_chr@geocities.com
Subject: The Wye Accord

Week Ending: November 13, 1998

1) ISRAELI CABINET APPROVES WYE
2) PALESTINIAN PRONOUNCEMENTS FOLLOWING WYE ACCORD
3) PALESTINIAN REJECTIONISTS DO NOT CONSIDER CHARTER CHANGED

1) ISRAELI CABINET APPROVES WYE

Israel's cabinet has approved the Wye Memorandum but made several
conditions for the redeployment from a further 13% of territory. The
vote was 8-4, with five ministers abstaining.

The main condition was that the PLO charter should be revoked by
a "properly conducted vote" of the Palestinian National Council.

The Wye Memorandum refers to the PNC and other Palestinian bodies
meeting with President Clinton next month in Gaza, to "reaffirm" the
nullification of clauses in the Charter calling for Israel's
destruction.

However, Palestinian officials are saying no ballot was mentioned
in the agreement. The PNC's 700 delegates include members of Hamas,
Islamic Jihad, the PFLP and other terrorist organizations bitterly
opposed to the peace process. Their leaders have already said they
will not abolish the charter and that if Yasser Arafat does so, he
will no longer be the leader of the PLO.

Some of Yasser Arafat's own supporters have said they are merely
obliged to listen to President Clinton make a speech, and will not
make decisions on the charter.

Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu also warned that if
Yasser Arafat declares a Palestinian state in May 1999, as he has threatened
to do if final negotiations are not completed by then, Israel may
apply "Israeli law" to areas such as East Jerusalem, Jewish
settlements, and "strategic" areas - widely taken as a threat to
formally annex the territory.

The Wye Memorandum is the third internationally brokered
agreement involving the PLO Charter. The Charter was supposed to be canceled as
part of the original Oslo Agreement, and later as part of the Hebron
Agreement. The US and the Palestinians object to the conditions that
the Israeli cabinet placed on the phased implementation of the Wye
Agreement. However , Netanyahu clearly points out that the conditions
are merely restatements of what has already been agreed to. The
Israeli cabinet wants to make it perfectly clear that the Palestinians
must reciprocate and comply with the terms of the agreement to get
any movement from Israel. (MED, November 1, 1998)

2) PALESTINIAN PRONOUNCEMENTS FOLLOWING WYE ACCORD

In the three weeks since the signing of the October 23, 1998 Wye
River Memorandum between Israel and the PLO, leading Palestinian
officials have made a series of remarks contradicting their
obligations under the agreement.

1) Amend the PLO Covenant:

"The joint meeting of the PLO Executive Committee, the PNC, the
Central Council and the Legislative Council is by the Palestinian
Nationa l intended only to listen to the speech of President Clinton
and there will be no vote [to amend the Covenant]." Council (PNC)
(Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat, Al-Ayyam, Nov. 4, 1998)

"We shall not convene the Palestinian National Council to change
the Covenant." (Abu Alaa, Speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council,
Yediot Aharonot, Nov. 6, 1998)

2) Halt Incitement:

"Jews are the seed of Satan and the devils" (PA television, Nov. 3,
1998)

3) Reduce the Size of the Palestinian Police:

"This is no problem. We will get around it by reallocating
policemen such that one who serves in one location can serve in another. We will
get around it by adopting a policy of transferring policemen." (PA
Police Chief Ghazi Jabali, Al-Quds, Nov. 4, 1998)

"With regard to lowering the number of Palestinian policemen, Dahlan
indicated that the Palestinians do not intend to lower their number.

He said, "We have no problem providing one list of policemen and a
second list of policemen who do administrative work..." (Muhammad
Dahlan, PA Preventive Security chief in Gaza, Al-Ayyam, Oct. 26, 1998)

4) Confiscate Illegal Weapons:

"There is a law for licensing weapons. Every respectable person
submits a request... and we give it to him... The weapons license is
granted to businessmen, dignitaries, politicians and wanted
fugitives..." (PA Police Chief Ghazi Jabali on PA TV, Oct. 30, 1998)

5) Arrest Terrorists:

"I can not arrest a Palestinian citizen who killed an Israeli and
at the same time give the Israeli the right to commit terrorist acts
against Palestinians... my primary security mission is... to protect
Palestinian security and defend Palestinian citizens." (Muhammad
Dahlan, PA Preventiv= e Security chief in Gaza, Al-Ayyam, Oct. 26,
1998)

"The Palestinians will not listen to the Israeli security forces'
instructions regarding who to arrest." (PA Minister Dr. Nabil Sha'ath,
Voice of Israel in Arabic, Nov. 5, 1998)

3) PALESTINIAN REJECTIONISTS DO NOT CONSIDER CHARTER CHANGED

Palestinian rejectionists maintain that the Palestinian Charter
has not yet been amended and called from Damascus for the Charter to
remain unchanged.

"Haaretz" reported on November 9, 1998 that ten Palestinian
rejectionist organizations met in Damascus on November 8th in order to
stop the amending of the Palestinian Charter, which calls for the
destruction of the State of Israel.

* Nayef Hawatmeh, head of the DFLP: Amending the sections of the
Charter would be "the destruction of the PLO and its replacement by
the Palestinian Authority as the one legitimate representative of the
Palestinian people. It is also the destruction of the one common plan
which unites the Palestinian people."

* Ahmed Jibril, head of General Command: "Changing the bulk of
the sections of the Charter constitutes the cancellation of the
Palestinian Charter. We must proclaim that we reject the Wye
Agreement and the leaders who accepted it, and that Arafat no longer
represents the PLO."

* Ramadan Abdullah Shallah, head of Islamic Jihad: Canceling the
Palestinian Charter will be "the last step in the process which Arafat
began which is meant to destroy the PLO and its institutions, namely
to destroy the Palestinian people." (IMRA, By: Aaron Lerner, November
10, 1998)

*********************************************************************

To educate, train and equip for study both the Jew and
Non-Jew in the Rich Hebraic Heritage of our Faith.

Please visit the Hebraic Roots Global Network
Web Site located at:

http://www.hebroots.org/

7th MILLENNIUM PROPHECY CONFERENCE

Featured Speakers:

Hal Lindsey
Yacov Rambsel
J.R. Church
Chuck Missler
Eddie Chumney

Topics to be discussed:

Y2K Computer Problem
Bible Codes
Economic Collapse
Armeggon: The Final Battle
Israel's Peace Process
Restoration of the Two Houses of Israel
Festival of the Lord in Prophecy
Unveiling Daniel's book

January 22-24, 1999

Trinity Church
12330 Perry Road
Houston, Texas

Sponsored by "Watchman of Issachar Ministry" in
association with Beth HaNeshrim and Kehilat Dvar
Hashem Messianic Congregations and Trinity Church

For more information, Contact "Watchman of Issachar Ministry"

1-888-825-1284 or Rick Avalle: 1-281-584-5660

E-mail: Issachar@flash.net